Comparison of Integration Types
Written by B3Networks Academy
Updated at June 2nd, 2023
-
OSS/BSS Answers
Access Control Admin Audit B3Network Master Account Channel App Contract App Customer App Discount App Edge Server File Management Finance App Invoice App Number Management Payment Portal Settings Price List Product App Release V2 SMS Gateway Supplier App Support Center Support Hub Business Hub Sales Hub
- App Model - Organization Management
- App Model - Communication Apps Answers
- License Model - Organization Management
-
License Model - CPaaS Solution Answers
Phone System - Admin Guide Phone System - End-user Guide Mobile App Desktop App Web Phone Auto Attendant - Admin Guide Developer Hub - Admin Guide Microsoft Teams Operator Connect - Admin Guide Microsoft Teams Direct Routing - Admin Guide Contact Center - Supervisor Guide Contact Center - Agent Guide Omni-Channel SIP Trunk CPaaS - SIP Trunk Power SIP Trunk CPaaS Fax Contact Dashboard Campaign File Explorer
- Telcoflow
- Integrations Answers
- Updated Regulations
- Ideas Portal
B3Networks now offers 3 types of direct routing deployment options depending on customer security requirements.
-
Option 1: Full Automation
- This option is recommended for most use cases. With this option, FQDN and SBC (Number) provisioning is automated via the CPaaS portal. The only manual portion is the PowerShell commands.
-
Option 2: Semi-Automation
- This option is for customers who do not want to authorize Microsoft global admin privileges.
-
Option 3: Full Manual (dedicated SBC solution)
- This option allows the customers to have their own SBC and custom FQDN.
Option |
Integration Type |
Dedicated SBC Support |
Customer FQDN Support |
Require Microsoft Global Admin Access |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Full Automation |
❌ |
❌ |
✅ |
2 |
Semi Automation |
❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
3 |
Full Manual |
✅ |
✅ |
❌ |